<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WOMMA Wants Wiki WOM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/384/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/384</link>
	<description>Building Better Web Sites Together, For A Better World</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 05:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Able</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/384#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Able</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 15:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/384#comment-478</guid>
		<description>Michael,

Thanks for stopping by!

Wikipedia will try to make an unbiased, consensus decision about how to present WOM, depending on available information and accepted norms.  They'll work it out, one way or another.  It's confusion over what WOM really is that fascinates me.

What an opportunity for WOMMA, and WOM marketers!  Public opinion is mixed and the natives are restless.  Try a Google search for define:wom.  Surely I am not the only one who sees an opportunity there!  Trot out out some definitions that will clarify WOM for the general public, and discuss, discuss, discuss. 

And, welcome to Cre8asite!  Come on into the forums and stay a while. 

- Elizabeth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by!</p>
<p>Wikipedia will try to make an unbiased, consensus decision about how to present WOM, depending on available information and accepted norms.  They&#8217;ll work it out, one way or another.  It&#8217;s confusion over what WOM really is that fascinates me.</p>
<p>What an opportunity for WOMMA, and WOM marketers!  Public opinion is mixed and the natives are restless.  Try a Google search for define:wom.  Surely I am not the only one who sees an opportunity there!  Trot out out some definitions that will clarify WOM for the general public, and discuss, discuss, discuss. </p>
<p>And, welcome to Cre8asite!  Come on into the forums and stay a while. </p>
<p>- Elizabeth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Rubin, WOMMA</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/384#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rubin, WOMMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/384#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Elizabeth --

Thanks for the post and helping to spread the word. We definitely appreciate it.

Speaking from the wazoo, at one point, the Wikipedia entry for WOM did include a link to WOMMA. We don't know the full details, but at some point, it was removed. We would rather the focus be on our members and thbe incredible work they're doing to help build this industry, anyway, so we let it pass.

Obviously, it's a different story when we're talking about the entry for the entire category being removed.

...Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth &#8211;</p>
<p>Thanks for the post and helping to spread the word. We definitely appreciate it.</p>
<p>Speaking from the wazoo, at one point, the Wikipedia entry for WOM did include a link to WOMMA. We don&#8217;t know the full details, but at some point, it was removed. We would rather the focus be on our members and thbe incredible work they&#8217;re doing to help build this industry, anyway, so we let it pass.</p>
<p>Obviously, it&#8217;s a different story when we&#8217;re talking about the entry for the entire category being removed.</p>
<p>&#8230;Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
