Comments on: Fed Up With Dumb Search Marketing Tactics and Web 2.0 http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/407 Building Better Web Sites Together, For A Better World Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:32:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Web Designers Norwich http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/407/comment-page-1#comment-136980 Web Designers Norwich Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:17:13 +0000 http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/407#comment-136980 Nearly 2 years since this article was written, i'm glad the web 2.0 phase is fading Nearly 2 years since this article was written, i’m glad the web 2.0 phase is fading

]]> By: Ashutosh P http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/407/comment-page-1#comment-136169 Ashutosh P Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:25:03 +0000 http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/407#comment-136169 I feel quite depressed when i see my articles(which i have put in hours to write)being copied and displayed on other directories (even article directories).And the saddest part of it is that they appear on the first page of search engines(means massive traffic) and my original web page containing the article is no where to be seen.So someone else is using my article to earn revenue but what can one do.That's the way on the web. I feel quite depressed when i see my articles(which i have put in hours to write)being copied and displayed on other directories (even article directories).And the saddest part of it is that they appear on the first page of search engines(means massive traffic) and my original web page containing the article is no where to be seen.So someone else is using my article to earn revenue but what can one do.That’s the way on the web.

]]> By: Joe Yann http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/407/comment-page-1#comment-117937 Joe Yann Mon, 21 Jul 2008 04:21:27 +0000 http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/407#comment-117937 Google was just a very early uptaker on the whole web 2.0 racket. When you think about it most of the big web 2.0 players are just organising, hosting or aggregating existing content. For example, many news sites aggregate AP feeds (or simply rewrite them), product comparison sites are just aggregating ROR feeds, eBay is just hoting millions of tiny stores. I found an article today that nails the whole 're-syndication' idea - http://www.demonzmedia.com/DemonzBlog/?p=12 I can uderstand why some people would choose to be critical of Google, but at the same time they give so much back (in terms of free services) that I think it's a balanced arguement. Google was just a very early uptaker on the whole web 2.0 racket.

When you think about it most of the big web 2.0 players are just organising, hosting or aggregating existing content. For example, many news sites aggregate AP feeds (or simply rewrite them), product comparison sites are just aggregating ROR feeds, eBay is just hoting millions of tiny stores. I found an article today that nails the whole ‘re-syndication’ idea -

http://www.demonzmedia.com/DemonzBlog/?p=12

I can uderstand why some people would choose to be critical of Google, but at the same time they give so much back (in terms of free services) that I think it’s a balanced arguement.

]]> By: Bill Slawski http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/407/comment-page-1#comment-78656 Bill Slawski Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:18:37 +0000 http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/407#comment-78656 Has the Web changed that much recently, or are we just paying more attention to some of these issues? Maybe they are coming to the forefront because it's becoming easier for people to aggregate content from other sources in different ways. I'm glad to see some of these discussions taking place. Has the Web changed that much recently, or are we just paying more attention to some of these issues?

Maybe they are coming to the forefront because it’s becoming easier for people to aggregate content from other sources in different ways.

I’m glad to see some of these discussions taking place.

]]>