<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fed Up With Dumb Search Marketing Tactics and Web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/407/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/407</link>
	<description>Building Better Web Sites Together, For A Better World</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Yann</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/407#comment-117937</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Yann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 04:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/407#comment-117937</guid>
		<description>Google was just a very early uptaker on the whole web 2.0 racket.

When you think about it most of the big web 2.0 players are just organising, hosting or aggregating existing content. For example, many news sites aggregate AP feeds (or simply rewrite them), product comparison sites are just aggregating ROR feeds, eBay is just hoting millions of tiny stores. I found an article today that nails the whole 're-syndication' idea -

http://www.demonzmedia.com/DemonzBlog/?p=12

I can uderstand why some people would choose to be critical of Google, but at the same time they give so much back (in terms of free services) that I think it's a balanced arguement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google was just a very early uptaker on the whole web 2.0 racket.</p>
<p>When you think about it most of the big web 2.0 players are just organising, hosting or aggregating existing content. For example, many news sites aggregate AP feeds (or simply rewrite them), product comparison sites are just aggregating ROR feeds, eBay is just hoting millions of tiny stores. I found an article today that nails the whole &#8216;re-syndication&#8217; idea -</p>
<p><a href="http://www.demonzmedia.com/DemonzBlog/?p=12" rel="nofollow">http://www.demonzmedia.com/DemonzBlog/?p=12</a></p>
<p>I can uderstand why some people would choose to be critical of Google, but at the same time they give so much back (in terms of free services) that I think it&#8217;s a balanced arguement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Slawski</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/407#comment-78656</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/407#comment-78656</guid>
		<description>Has the Web changed that much recently, or are we just paying more attention to some of these issues?

Maybe they are coming to the forefront because it's becoming easier for people to aggregate content from other sources in different ways.

I'm glad to see some of these discussions taking place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has the Web changed that much recently, or are we just paying more attention to some of these issues?</p>
<p>Maybe they are coming to the forefront because it&#8217;s becoming easier for people to aggregate content from other sources in different ways.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad to see some of these discussions taking place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
