Michael Grey recently posted a video blog entitled SEO Bloggers Step Away From the Keyboard. Despite being in a format I can’t stand (unless your name is Ze Frank or definitely-not-a-man-da Congdon), it makes a very needed point (one I will save you the trouble of working out): you are not adding to the converstaion if you don’t say anything unique, original or new.
I ‘m glad I’m not the only feeling this way, as not just Michael Grey but also former Cre8 Tech admin Dave Child (aka ILoveJackDaniels) feels this way, with Dave’s brilliantly funny post “Dear Blogger” I Resign as your reader summing up exactly how I feel.
If you visit Grey Wolf’s blog, you will see the case for the defence, presented by Barry and Chris (both also in the annoying video format) that both claim all this blogging is great. Unfortunately, neither were very compelling, as Barry argued that he liked monotonous repetition, and Chris offerred only that not everyone is an A-list blogger (as if that was a defence of unoriginality) and blogger-centric rational (growing a business being one). The problem with is that a true conversation conducted via blogs should, in my view, be reader-centric.
As the web is full of blogs (SEO more than any other topic), I think it helps to imagine the interweb as one giant, ongoing conversation. If you are standing around repeating what the dude in the middle just said to people behind you, you aren’t a part of the conversation, you are just background noise happenning somewhere near the real conversation. To be a true part of the conversation, you need to say something no one else in the conversation has said, or offer some new insight on what was already said.
Lets use a practical example: Yahoo release the NOYDIR robots meta directive, and you blog about it. Why? What are you going to say that Danny Sullivan didn’t (and notice how his post asked questions with followups which is a, yes, conversation)? What can you add to Danny’s analysis to firther the conversation meaningfully? Can you add anything to what Danny wrote? If the answer is no, then simply don’t blog. Instead, point to Danny’s Blog.
That is why I am officially announcing Proposition 301 (as in permanent redirect, get it?), that aims to stop bloggers regurgitating what others have said without significant (and unique) commentary. We need to save people the hassle of deleting yet another link from their RSS reader that doesn’t do anything more than repeat someone else’s ideas and discoveries.
Despite the overly negative overtones of Proposition 301, I don’t want it to be seen as a demand that bloggers give up. Not at all. Rather, I want Proposition 301 to be a call to do better, to find ways to increase the breadth and depth of the conversation, because if saying what everyone else has already said is the problem, the solution is delightfully simple: say what no one else has.
Rather than aiming to be “the next Danny Sullivan”, the “next Rand Fishkin” or “next Jeremy Zawodny”, I want, I need, you to aim to be the first YOU, a blogger with something unique and interesting to say. Like my good friend Bill with has patents, Barry and his machine like consitency, Lisa and her swimfan-SEO-stalker-SOAP-opera-fights-with-Susan Vibe, isos’s wackiness and Rand’s rediculous openess, you need to find something you can do / be that makes your blog worthy of being part of the conversation, your own blogging raison d’etre.
If you can’t describe the “soul” of your blog as succinctly as I just did (Lisa excluded) for the bloggers above, then please, stop blogging untill you can. Whatever it might be, you need to find a niche that allows you to add an interesting tidbit to the growing online conversation.
I want to leave you with a positive example of not just good blogging, but extraordinary blogging: Kathy Sierra. Kathy’s Latest post is precisely what a great blog post should be: original, thought provoking, unique, different and passionate about a topic no else has covered, written in an informal, corporate-spin-free Way that not only entertains, but engages. Even better, Kathy uses the whole page to convey a message, with images and diagrams not just there to add visual highlights, but as integral parts of the post.
No one else, and I mean no one, writes, no, constructs a better blog post than Kathy, and whilst you and I may never reach Kathy’s level, we can all, collectively, raise the bar and have a proper, inclusive conversation if we all stop yelling the same thing, and instead start offerring something compelling and unique.



Ah I quite agree. I think it’s one of the reasons my blogging has never taken off, I rarely think of something I think is worth saying in a blog!
I have been unsubscribing from blogs that seem to just repeat other sites, or do one line links off.
There are other blogs which have become uninteresting, but because for a while they were so interesting to me, I keep them in my feed reader in case the writer finds new inspiration.
And I completely agree about Kathy Sierra. Her blog is ALWAYS thought provoking. I find her writing less about telling you what to do, and more about making you think about it, which is awesome. She’s written a few times about making your customers feel awesome, and that they can do really cool stuff, using your product.
Well, that’s what Kathy’s blog does for me.
Comment by Adrian Lee — March 21, 2007 @ 8:57 pm
A great topic, Michael, that should be spread around by all who care. One tip that I think helps is to do a Google Blogsearch on the title of your intended post before you work on it. You then may find you have the following choices:
a) it’s been blogged to death so fergetaboutit
b) your view is different so you have something that’s worth saying, and/or
c) you can point to a few items that help to open up the subject.
Life is too short to merely do what everyone else is doing.
Comment by Barry Welford — March 21, 2007 @ 10:25 pm
It’s the evolution of blogging I think. In the beginning, there was more writing original content because blogs were online journals. Then they became news outlets, and were more convenient than news sites because of RSS feeds.
Next came the ads. This, to me, is the tipping point, when blog life as we knew it changed forever. Now, it takes some time to find which blogs are worth taking a moment of your time each day.
More and more people are choosing quality over quantity, and value things like trust, honesty, credibility and intent.
Comment by Kim Krause Berg — March 21, 2007 @ 10:36 pm
I’m not completely sure that I agree, and I’ll explain why. It’s good to have a voice of dissent here on the topic.
Blogging is a chance to begin conversations, and an opportunity to find a voice of your own. The effort in finding and deciding what to post is part of that, and sharing news with your readers, determining what is important enough to post about is one of those parts. Acting as a filter for the news is important in its own way.
The “step away from the keyboard” video disturbed me. I want to see people develop their own voices, their own perspectives, their own interests. I want to see them try out new things, and take a few chances now and then. Rather than stepping away, it would be great if people would spend a little more time sitting at their keyboards and thinking about how they can grow as a blogger, as a communicator.
A couple of articles that I turn to every so often for inspiration are these two:
10 Tips on Writing the Living Web
and
Ten Tips For A Better Weblog
I’ve written to a few blogs over the past five years or so. Some of the most effective blogging I’ve done was to take the news and regurgitate it. Instead of just a short blurb with a link though, I would add a few links to resources that the newspaper didn’t include, to original resources, and insert a little taste of opinion to show that I read the articles and resources and had an opinion and some thoughts on them.
I hope that Michael Gray’s post didn’t discourage people. I hope that this post doesn’t discourage them either. I want to see people grow and thrive, and if that means starting out by posting everyday, writing about the news, and spending some time finding their own unique voices while they are doing so, then I’m happy to see that.
Rather than telling people to stop, why not post a friendly comment and ask some questions? Show them that you are interested in them, and their opinions? Encourage our bright voices of tomorrow as they grow, and I think that we all grow.
Comment by Bill Slawski — March 21, 2007 @ 10:39 pm
It is nice to see a well-respected and well-known blogger like Mr. Slawski advocating a more inclusive stance on this than what was being presented in Mr. Gray’s video. If so-called A-list bloggers were genuinely to exclude all other bloggers, what a dry, isolated, self-centered community they would end up becoming, with no one to talk to but themselves.
Fortunately, I don’t see this as the case. My own experience with blogging has taught me that the best bloggers are inclusive, open and welcoming of newcomers. Remember, the folks who comment on the more popular blogs are your ‘clients’. Alienating them by saying “don’t speak unless you’re spoken to” is hardly a good way to market your brand, win loyalty, or create an appealing place to be. Without those readers, your blog has just ceased to have a function, unless it is for you and your buddies to read. My understanding is that blogging is meant to create community and is not about behaving like a 7 year old who wants everyone to play only his games and doesn’t want to play anyone else’s games.
So, to Michael - remember what your mother said; that your readers, who are also bloggers, are you guests. They are the GUESTS, Michael. You should play their games sometimes, too.
I don’t know if Michael realizes how self-important he came off sounding in the video. In general, I enjoy his posts. But I do not like a spirit of segregation in any type of human interaction. I don’t like the concept of a-list and b-list people.
I like the idea of equals talking to one another. Whether you have a PHD in SEO (and none of us do) and the other fellow just learned what a Title Tag is yesterday afternoon, chances are, each party will learn something if they are willing to share and listen.
Comment by Miriam — March 22, 2007 @ 8:21 am
I agree with Bill on this one. The more voices the better, even if many tend to be banal.
I figure the readers are the ultimate barometer of the success or failure of a blog, a blog post, a book or an article. Either they read it or they don’t.
Perhaps bloggers with nothing original to say should take a look at their traffic logs. If they are low, then a simple cost-benefit analysis suggests that there is likely something better they could do with their time. If, however, the numbers say other folks are interested, perhaps it is worth the regurgative effort.
The act of writing should be, in and of itself, an exersize in original expression. That’s what it’s all about eh? Most of the time, there are only two or three major stories worth looking at. Given the number of bloggers out there, it is little wonder there is so much repetition of coverage. Some will be good, others will not. As a reader, it is up to you to judge (like, literally) by spending time on a page or leaving a page to never return again.
All that said, there is little more I could add except to recommend reading Bill’s post (above) a second and third time. I think he is absolutely correct.
Comment by Jim Hedger — March 22, 2007 @ 9:33 am
” If so-called A-list bloggers were genuinely to exclude all other bloggers”
But that isn’t what this is about. It isn’t about exclusion. It is about why.
Why do we blog? What is the point? What are we, collectively, trying to achieve?
The view that this is anyone telling anyone else to give up is not the case. It is about finding your blogging “soul”, that little thing that makes your blog worth reading.
Everyone SHOULD have a go blogging, but only if they have something to say. IF you don’t, then don’t say anything. Don’t fill your blog for the sake of it, actually say something.
Or respond to what others say. Where is the conversation if we all talk, all about the same thing in the same way?
That, the repetition and unoriginality, that is stopping, not increasing, the conversation, by increasing the noise.
Comment by Michael — March 22, 2007 @ 8:42 pm
Personally, I don’t get it… perhaps that’s b/c I am not an A-List blogger. I respect Gray’s opinion and think he’s a terribly smart person but for this “stop blogging” POV, I can’t agree.
I think conversation is important (no matter how mundane). I also think that believing everyone has something original to say is a bit of an overstatement. Truth is that most people don’t have original thoughts… but you know what? That’s ok and they still should be allowed to speak their minds. I think calling for people to be silenced is a bit elitist. I mean, the idea of defining original thought is a much larger question than I think an A-List SEO Blogger should be tackling.
And who gets to define what is original? I mean, Local TV news just regurgitates what the national news says - should we silence local news? Typically, authors, painters, photographers steal from their mentors… should they stop showing their work in galleries or publishing books (poor Bill Shakespeare)? If the focus of the post was to out Sploggers… I would have gotten it. But the fact is that it just seemed to cut at the average blogger and that I just don’t get.
Comment by Tech Mentat — March 23, 2007 @ 7:16 am
“Truth is that most people don’t have original thoughts… but you know what? That’s ok and they still should be allowed to speak their minds.”
If blogging is all be about people “speaking their minds” and not engaging in a conversation, whio will listen?
“And who gets to define what is original? I mean, Local TV news just regurgitates what the national news says - should we silence local news?”
But they aren’t blogs, and their raison d’etre is differnemt. blogs are suppossed to be your thoughts, not others. They are suppossed to be your ideas, or your unique input on other’s ideas.
“But the fact is that it just seemed to cut at the average blogger and that I just don’t get.”
The idea that it is insulting to people is silly. Criticism means to offer a critique, to offer advice on improving. 99.9% of bloggers would improve if they stepped away from the keyboard and thought long and hard about what they are trying to say, to whom and why.
Without a focus on the reasons for blogging, there really is no point.
Comment by Michael — March 23, 2007 @ 9:41 am
[...] March 23, 2007 // With so much drama in the LBC (Lower-Tier Blogger Community), it’s kind of hard being… well… comfortable about blogging. But rest well my friends. Today I found out (via Kineda) that I am a C-List Blogger and I couldn’t be more happy. Sure, A-List Bloggers get to enjoy the riches, the woman, the notoriety but C-List Bloggers enjoy much more unseen (quiet) benefits. [...]
Pingback by A, B, C-List Ya’ Later! Definition of a C-List Blogger. - Tech Mentat — March 23, 2007 @ 5:10 pm
My personal little tip to Michael is that he should stay away from the camera! Really, the ’step away from the keyboard’ vlog is positively boring and adds nothing to the conversation at all. He may be going on about how if you’re not adding to the conversation you should get lost, but I think he isn’t adding anything through this post. Not only that, but I cannot handle the video format. It doesn’t seem to engage me enough as much as plain blogging and writing does. Plus, if it’s boring (as this one was) you can’t skip to see if it gets exciting later on. You have to watch the whole dang thing.
Please, step away from the camera, and go back to writing.
Comment by toys — November 28, 2007 @ 8:16 am
It’s good that the readers are now the gauge whether a blog is good or not. Most of the time bloggers just blog for the sake of blogging. They don’t even realize that their blog is already full of nonsense blah blah.
Comment by art gift portraits — February 22, 2008 @ 9:52 pm