<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vote Yes To Proposition 301: Stop Unoriginal Blog Posts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408</link>
	<description>Building Better Web Sites Together, For A Better World</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: art gift portraits</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-105104</link>
		<dc:creator>art gift portraits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-105104</guid>
		<description>It’s good that the readers are now the gauge whether a blog is good or not.  Most of the time bloggers just blog for the sake of blogging.  They don’t even realize that their blog is already full of nonsense blah blah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s good that the readers are now the gauge whether a blog is good or not.  Most of the time bloggers just blog for the sake of blogging.  They don’t even realize that their blog is already full of nonsense blah blah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toys</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-104609</link>
		<dc:creator>toys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-104609</guid>
		<description>My personal little tip to Michael is that he should stay away from the camera! Really, the 'step away from the keyboard' vlog is positively boring and adds nothing to the conversation at all. He may be going on about how if you're not adding to the conversation you should get lost, but I think he isn't adding anything through this post. Not only that, but I cannot handle the video format. It doesn't seem to engage me enough as much as plain blogging and writing does. Plus, if it's boring (as this one was) you can't skip to see if it gets exciting later on. You have to watch the whole dang thing. 

Please, step away from the camera, and go back to writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My personal little tip to Michael is that he should stay away from the camera! Really, the &#8217;step away from the keyboard&#8217; vlog is positively boring and adds nothing to the conversation at all. He may be going on about how if you&#8217;re not adding to the conversation you should get lost, but I think he isn&#8217;t adding anything through this post. Not only that, but I cannot handle the video format. It doesn&#8217;t seem to engage me enough as much as plain blogging and writing does. Plus, if it&#8217;s boring (as this one was) you can&#8217;t skip to see if it gets exciting later on. You have to watch the whole dang thing. </p>
<p>Please, step away from the camera, and go back to writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A, B, C-List Ya’ Later! Definition of a C-List Blogger. - Tech Mentat</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-78994</link>
		<dc:creator>A, B, C-List Ya’ Later! Definition of a C-List Blogger. - Tech Mentat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 07:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-78994</guid>
		<description>[...] March 23, 2007 //    With so much drama in the LBC (Lower-Tier Blogger Community), it’s kind of hard being… well… comfortable about blogging.  But rest well my friends. Today I found out (via Kineda) that I am a C-List Blogger and I couldn’t be more happy. Sure, A-List Bloggers get to enjoy the riches, the woman, the notoriety but C-List Bloggers enjoy much more unseen (quiet) benefits.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] March 23, 2007 //    With so much drama in the LBC (Lower-Tier Blogger Community), it’s kind of hard being… well… comfortable about blogging.  But rest well my friends. Today I found out (via Kineda) that I am a C-List Blogger and I couldn’t be more happy. Sure, A-List Bloggers get to enjoy the riches, the woman, the notoriety but C-List Bloggers enjoy much more unseen (quiet) benefits.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-78812</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-78812</guid>
		<description>"Truth is that most people don’t have original thoughts… but you know what? That’s ok and they still should be allowed to speak their minds."
If blogging is all be about people "speaking their minds" and not engaging in a conversation, whio will listen?

"And who gets to define what is original? I mean, Local TV news just regurgitates what the national news says - should we silence local news?"
But they aren't blogs, and their raison d'etre is differnemt. blogs are suppossed to be your thoughts, not others. They are suppossed to be your ideas, or your unique input on other's ideas. 

"But the fact is that it just seemed to cut at the average blogger and that I just don’t get."
The idea that it is insulting to people is silly. Criticism means to offer a critique, to offer advice on improving. 99.9% of bloggers would improve if they stepped away from the keyboard and thought long and hard about what they are trying to say, to whom and why. 

Without a focus on the reasons for blogging, there really is no point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Truth is that most people don’t have original thoughts… but you know what? That’s ok and they still should be allowed to speak their minds.&#8221;<br />
If blogging is all be about people &#8220;speaking their minds&#8221; and not engaging in a conversation, whio will listen?</p>
<p>&#8220;And who gets to define what is original? I mean, Local TV news just regurgitates what the national news says - should we silence local news?&#8221;<br />
But they aren&#8217;t blogs, and their raison d&#8217;etre is differnemt. blogs are suppossed to be your thoughts, not others. They are suppossed to be your ideas, or your unique input on other&#8217;s ideas. </p>
<p>&#8220;But the fact is that it just seemed to cut at the average blogger and that I just don’t get.&#8221;<br />
The idea that it is insulting to people is silly. Criticism means to offer a critique, to offer advice on improving. 99.9% of bloggers would improve if they stepped away from the keyboard and thought long and hard about what they are trying to say, to whom and why. </p>
<p>Without a focus on the reasons for blogging, there really is no point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Mentat</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-78753</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Mentat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 21:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-78753</guid>
		<description>Personally, I don't get it... perhaps that's b/c I am not an A-List blogger. I respect Gray's opinion and think he's a terribly smart person but for this "stop blogging" POV, I can't agree. 
I think conversation is important (no matter how mundane). I also think that believing everyone has something original to say is a bit of an overstatement. Truth is that most people don't have original thoughts... but you know what? That's ok and they still should be allowed to speak their minds. I think calling for people to be silenced is a bit elitist. I mean, the idea of defining original thought is a much larger question than I think an A-List SEO Blogger should be tackling. 
And who gets to define what is original? I mean, Local TV news just regurgitates what the national news says - should we silence local news? Typically, authors, painters, photographers steal from their mentors... should they stop showing their work in galleries or publishing books (poor Bill Shakespeare)? If the focus of the post was to out Sploggers... I would have gotten it. But the fact is that it just seemed to cut at the average blogger and that I just don't get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t get it&#8230; perhaps that&#8217;s b/c I am not an A-List blogger. I respect Gray&#8217;s opinion and think he&#8217;s a terribly smart person but for this &#8220;stop blogging&#8221; POV, I can&#8217;t agree.<br />
I think conversation is important (no matter how mundane). I also think that believing everyone has something original to say is a bit of an overstatement. Truth is that most people don&#8217;t have original thoughts&#8230; but you know what? That&#8217;s ok and they still should be allowed to speak their minds. I think calling for people to be silenced is a bit elitist. I mean, the idea of defining original thought is a much larger question than I think an A-List SEO Blogger should be tackling.<br />
And who gets to define what is original? I mean, Local TV news just regurgitates what the national news says - should we silence local news? Typically, authors, painters, photographers steal from their mentors&#8230; should they stop showing their work in galleries or publishing books (poor Bill Shakespeare)? If the focus of the post was to out Sploggers&#8230; I would have gotten it. But the fact is that it just seemed to cut at the average blogger and that I just don&#8217;t get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-78345</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-78345</guid>
		<description>" If so-called A-list bloggers were genuinely to exclude all other bloggers"
But that isn't what this is about. It isn't about exclusion. It is about why.

Why do we blog? What is the point? What are we, collectively, trying to achieve?

The view that this is anyone telling anyone else to give up is not  the case. It  is about finding your blogging "soul", that little thing that makes your blog worth reading.

Everyone SHOULD have a go blogging, but only if they have something to say. IF you don't, then don't say anything. Don't fill your blog for the sake of it, actually say something.

Or respond to what others say. Where is the conversation if we all talk, all about the same thing in the same way?

That, the repetition and unoriginality, that is stopping, not increasing, the conversation, by increasing the noise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; If so-called A-list bloggers were genuinely to exclude all other bloggers&#8221;<br />
But that isn&#8217;t what this is about. It isn&#8217;t about exclusion. It is about why.</p>
<p>Why do we blog? What is the point? What are we, collectively, trying to achieve?</p>
<p>The view that this is anyone telling anyone else to give up is not  the case. It  is about finding your blogging &#8220;soul&#8221;, that little thing that makes your blog worth reading.</p>
<p>Everyone SHOULD have a go blogging, but only if they have something to say. IF you don&#8217;t, then don&#8217;t say anything. Don&#8217;t fill your blog for the sake of it, actually say something.</p>
<p>Or respond to what others say. Where is the conversation if we all talk, all about the same thing in the same way?</p>
<p>That, the repetition and unoriginality, that is stopping, not increasing, the conversation, by increasing the noise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hedger</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-77820</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hedger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-77820</guid>
		<description>I agree with Bill on this one.  The more voices the better, even if many tend to be banal. 

I figure the readers are the ultimate barometer of the success or failure of a blog, a blog post, a book or an article. Either they read it or they don't. 

Perhaps bloggers with nothing original to say should take a look at their traffic logs. If they are low, then a simple cost-benefit analysis suggests that there is likely something better they could do with their time. If, however, the numbers say other folks are interested, perhaps it is worth the regurgative effort. 

The act of writing should be, in and of itself, an exersize in original expression. That's what it's all about eh? Most of the time, there are only two or three major stories worth looking at. Given the number of bloggers out there, it is little wonder there is so much repetition of coverage. Some will be good, others will not. As a reader, it is up to you to judge (like, literally) by spending time on a page or leaving a page to never return again. 

All that said, there is little more I could add except to recommend reading Bill's post (above) a second and third time. I think he is absolutely correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Bill on this one.  The more voices the better, even if many tend to be banal. </p>
<p>I figure the readers are the ultimate barometer of the success or failure of a blog, a blog post, a book or an article. Either they read it or they don&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Perhaps bloggers with nothing original to say should take a look at their traffic logs. If they are low, then a simple cost-benefit analysis suggests that there is likely something better they could do with their time. If, however, the numbers say other folks are interested, perhaps it is worth the regurgative effort. </p>
<p>The act of writing should be, in and of itself, an exersize in original expression. That&#8217;s what it&#8217;s all about eh? Most of the time, there are only two or three major stories worth looking at. Given the number of bloggers out there, it is little wonder there is so much repetition of coverage. Some will be good, others will not. As a reader, it is up to you to judge (like, literally) by spending time on a page or leaving a page to never return again. </p>
<p>All that said, there is little more I could add except to recommend reading Bill&#8217;s post (above) a second and third time. I think he is absolutely correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miriam</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-77781</link>
		<dc:creator>Miriam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-77781</guid>
		<description>It is nice to see a well-respected and well-known blogger like Mr. Slawski advocating a more inclusive stance on this than what was being presented in Mr. Gray's video. If so-called A-list bloggers were genuinely to exclude all other bloggers, what a dry, isolated, self-centered community they would end up becoming, with no one to talk to but themselves.

Fortunately, I don't see this as the case. My own experience with blogging has taught me that the best bloggers are inclusive, open and welcoming of newcomers. Remember, the folks who comment on the more popular blogs are your 'clients'. Alienating them by saying "don't speak unless you're spoken to" is hardly a good way to market your brand, win loyalty, or create an appealing place to be. Without those readers, your blog has just ceased to have a function, unless it is for you and your buddies to read. My understanding is that blogging is meant to create community and is not about behaving like a 7 year old who wants everyone to play only his games and doesn't want to play anyone else's games.

So, to Michael - remember what  your mother said; that your readers, who are also bloggers, are you guests. They are the GUESTS, Michael.  You should play their games sometimes, too. 

I don't know if Michael realizes how self-important he came off sounding in the video. In general, I enjoy his posts. But I do not like a spirit of segregation in any type of human interaction. I don't like the concept of a-list and b-list people. 

I like the idea of equals talking to one another. Whether you have a PHD in SEO (and none of us do) and the other fellow just learned what a Title Tag is yesterday afternoon, chances are, each party will learn something if they are willing to share and listen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is nice to see a well-respected and well-known blogger like Mr. Slawski advocating a more inclusive stance on this than what was being presented in Mr. Gray&#8217;s video. If so-called A-list bloggers were genuinely to exclude all other bloggers, what a dry, isolated, self-centered community they would end up becoming, with no one to talk to but themselves.</p>
<p>Fortunately, I don&#8217;t see this as the case. My own experience with blogging has taught me that the best bloggers are inclusive, open and welcoming of newcomers. Remember, the folks who comment on the more popular blogs are your &#8216;clients&#8217;. Alienating them by saying &#8220;don&#8217;t speak unless you&#8217;re spoken to&#8221; is hardly a good way to market your brand, win loyalty, or create an appealing place to be. Without those readers, your blog has just ceased to have a function, unless it is for you and your buddies to read. My understanding is that blogging is meant to create community and is not about behaving like a 7 year old who wants everyone to play only his games and doesn&#8217;t want to play anyone else&#8217;s games.</p>
<p>So, to Michael - remember what  your mother said; that your readers, who are also bloggers, are you guests. They are the GUESTS, Michael.  You should play their games sometimes, too. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if Michael realizes how self-important he came off sounding in the video. In general, I enjoy his posts. But I do not like a spirit of segregation in any type of human interaction. I don&#8217;t like the concept of a-list and b-list people. </p>
<p>I like the idea of equals talking to one another. Whether you have a PHD in SEO (and none of us do) and the other fellow just learned what a Title Tag is yesterday afternoon, chances are, each party will learn something if they are willing to share and listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Slawski</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-77447</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-77447</guid>
		<description>I'm not completely sure that I agree, and I'll explain why.  It's good to have a voice of dissent here on the topic.

Blogging is a chance to begin conversations, and an opportunity to find a voice of your own.   The effort in finding and deciding what to post is part of that, and sharing news with your readers, determining what is important enough to post about is one of those parts.  Acting as a filter for the news is important in its own way.

The "step away from the keyboard" video disturbed me.  I want to see people develop their own voices, their own perspectives, their own interests.  I want to see them try out new things, and take a few chances now and then.  Rather than stepping away, it would be great if people would spend a little more time sitting at their keyboards and thinking about how they can grow as a blogger, as a communicator.

A couple of articles that I turn to every so often for inspiration are these two:

&lt;a href="http://alistapart.com/articles/writeliving/" rel="nofollow"&gt;10 Tips on Writing the Living Web&lt;/a&gt;

and

&lt;a href="http://www.rebeccablood.net/essays/ten_tips.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ten Tips For A Better Weblog&lt;/a&gt;

I've written to a few blogs over the past five years or so.  Some of the most effective blogging I've done was to take the news and regurgitate it. Instead of just a short blurb with a link though, I would add a few links to resources that the newspaper didn't include, to original resources, and insert a little taste of opinion to show that I read the articles and resources and had an opinion and some thoughts on them.  

I hope that Michael Gray's post didn't discourage people.  I hope that this post doesn't discourage them either.  I want to see people grow and thrive, and if that means starting out by posting everyday, writing about the news, and spending some time finding their own unique voices while they are doing so, then I'm happy to see that.

Rather than telling people to stop, why not post a friendly comment and ask some questions?  Show them that you are interested in them, and their opinions?  Encourage our bright voices of tomorrow as they grow, and I think that we all grow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not completely sure that I agree, and I&#8217;ll explain why.  It&#8217;s good to have a voice of dissent here on the topic.</p>
<p>Blogging is a chance to begin conversations, and an opportunity to find a voice of your own.   The effort in finding and deciding what to post is part of that, and sharing news with your readers, determining what is important enough to post about is one of those parts.  Acting as a filter for the news is important in its own way.</p>
<p>The &#8220;step away from the keyboard&#8221; video disturbed me.  I want to see people develop their own voices, their own perspectives, their own interests.  I want to see them try out new things, and take a few chances now and then.  Rather than stepping away, it would be great if people would spend a little more time sitting at their keyboards and thinking about how they can grow as a blogger, as a communicator.</p>
<p>A couple of articles that I turn to every so often for inspiration are these two:</p>
<p><a href="http://alistapart.com/articles/writeliving/" rel="nofollow">10 Tips on Writing the Living Web</a></p>
<p>and</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rebeccablood.net/essays/ten_tips.html" rel="nofollow">Ten Tips For A Better Weblog</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written to a few blogs over the past five years or so.  Some of the most effective blogging I&#8217;ve done was to take the news and regurgitate it. Instead of just a short blurb with a link though, I would add a few links to resources that the newspaper didn&#8217;t include, to original resources, and insert a little taste of opinion to show that I read the articles and resources and had an opinion and some thoughts on them.  </p>
<p>I hope that Michael Gray&#8217;s post didn&#8217;t discourage people.  I hope that this post doesn&#8217;t discourage them either.  I want to see people grow and thrive, and if that means starting out by posting everyday, writing about the news, and spending some time finding their own unique voices while they are doing so, then I&#8217;m happy to see that.</p>
<p>Rather than telling people to stop, why not post a friendly comment and ask some questions?  Show them that you are interested in them, and their opinions?  Encourage our bright voices of tomorrow as they grow, and I think that we all grow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Krause Berg</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-77445</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Krause Berg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/408#comment-77445</guid>
		<description>It's the evolution of blogging I think. In the beginning, there was more writing original content because blogs were online journals.  Then they became news outlets, and were more convenient than news sites because of RSS feeds. 

Next came the ads.  This, to me, is the tipping point, when blog life as we knew it changed forever.  Now, it takes some time to find which blogs are worth taking a moment of your time each day. 

More and more people are choosing quality over quantity, and value things like trust, honesty, credibility and intent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the evolution of blogging I think. In the beginning, there was more writing original content because blogs were online journals.  Then they became news outlets, and were more convenient than news sites because of <acronym title="Really Simple Syndication">RSS</acronym> feeds. </p>
<p>Next came the ads.  This, to me, is the tipping point, when blog life as we knew it changed forever.  Now, it takes some time to find which blogs are worth taking a moment of your time each day. </p>
<p>More and more people are choosing quality over quantity, and value things like trust, honesty, credibility and intent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
