<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Founders On Advertising Way Back When</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/429/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/429</link>
	<description>Building Better Web Sites Together, For A Better World</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Saschaeh</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/429#comment-101767</link>
		<dc:creator>Saschaeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 07:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/429#comment-101767</guid>
		<description>Yes I see what the guy is saying but here is a catch, a search engine only makes advertising revenue because it has a critical number of users and users only use the search engine if it provides the best results they are looking for , case in point the switch to Google from yahoo in the late nineties.  A major engine like Google is unlikely to be involved in this kind of activity. Its primary client is the user . I have seen advertisers try all kind of tactics and Google  answer is if it hurts the user experience then no regardless of money involved .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I see what the guy is saying but here is a catch, a search engine only makes advertising revenue because it has a critical number of users and users only use the search engine if it provides the best results they are looking for , case in point the switch to Google from yahoo in the late nineties.  A major engine like Google is unlikely to be involved in this kind of activity. Its primary client is the user . I have seen advertisers try all kind of tactics and Google  answer is if it hurts the user experience then no regardless of money involved .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan&#8217;s Picks for June 12 &#124; Marketing Pilgrim</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/429#comment-95042</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan&#8217;s Picks for June 12 &#124; Marketing Pilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/429#comment-95042</guid>
		<description>[...] Cr8tive Flow takes us back to Google Founders On Advertising Way Back When [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cr8tive Flow takes us back to Google Founders On Advertising Way Back When [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/429#comment-95040</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/429#comment-95040</guid>
		<description>Lol 

It would be fun to ask Google some of there own questions regarding their present business model.

I am mostly thinking about the problems this discovery have created: 

"For example, we noticed a major search engine would not return a large airline’s homepage when the airline’s name was given as a query. It so happened that the airline had placed an expensive ad, linked to the query that was its name. A better search engine would not have required this ad, and possibly resulted in the loss of the revenue from the airline to the search engine."

I am not sure the most relevant websites for a search is the website that have al the keywords in the URL. I think Google and the other search engines are afraid of getting in the same situation as in the described quote.

I vote for less favor to keyword rich URLs will improve the search results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol </p>
<p>It would be fun to ask Google some of there own questions regarding their present business model.</p>
<p>I am mostly thinking about the problems this discovery have created: </p>
<p>&#8220;For example, we noticed a major search engine would not return a large airline’s homepage when the airline’s name was given as a query. It so happened that the airline had placed an expensive ad, linked to the query that was its name. A better search engine would not have required this ad, and possibly resulted in the loss of the revenue from the airline to the search engine.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am not sure the most relevant websites for a search is the website that have al the keywords in the <acronym title="Uniform Resource Locator">URL</acronym>. I think Google and the other search engines are afraid of getting in the same situation as in the described quote.</p>
<p>I vote for less favor to keyword rich URLs will improve the search results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
