<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Old Media Still Don&#8217;t Get It (Even When They Kinda, Sorta Do!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/435/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/435</link>
	<description>Building Better Web Sites Together, For A Better World</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: AbleReach</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/435#comment-101360</link>
		<dc:creator>AbleReach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 21:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/435#comment-101360</guid>
		<description>Even links to topically relevant articles by the same paper would help.  

Also, I wonder if fact-checkers could go a little bonkers over links leading to resources over which a newspaper has no control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even links to topically relevant articles by the same paper would help.  </p>
<p>Also, I wonder if fact-checkers could go a little bonkers over links leading to resources over which a newspaper has no control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/435#comment-101359</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 17:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/435#comment-101359</guid>
		<description>The problem really is money. The journalists aren't incentivised to learn, and the papers don't want them to, because they don't want to lose the traffic.

Which is sad, because links would be good for all concerned, and might help save newspapers, longer term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem really is money. The journalists aren&#8217;t incentivised to learn, and the papers don&#8217;t want them to, because they don&#8217;t want to lose the traffic.</p>
<p>Which is sad, because links would be good for all concerned, and might help save newspapers, longer term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AbleReach</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/435#comment-101313</link>
		<dc:creator>AbleReach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 07:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/archives/435#comment-101313</guid>
		<description>"A written conversation requires links to what you are responding to in order to be, well, a conversation."

Good point.  Links are a world-changer.

I think that links were first explained to me in 1991, because I at the time I was lusting over the brand new 14440 baud modem.  :) 

The example given was that a scientist at CERN  in Europe could publish a paper online and add a "live" link to a reference by a scientist across the world, as long as the other paper was also online.  Astounding.  I looked at the screen, slackjawed, tears in my eyes, and thought of having watched the Berlin Wall fall on TV.  The Wall fell in 1989.  

Sometimes, for a surprisingly long time, you can know things in your heart without knowing them in daily life, &#38; vice versa.  Maybe that's where old media is with links.  I don't see links in most newspaper "blog" articles.  

I wonder what percentage of high school kids can fix a broken link?  Or if the majority of journalists can make and fix links?  You know they have some Internet research techniques under their belts, but how close are they to linking to references?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A written conversation requires links to what you are responding to in order to be, well, a conversation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Good point.  Links are a world-changer.</p>
<p>I think that links were first explained to me in 1991, because I at the time I was lusting over the brand new 14440 baud modem.  <img src='http://blog.cre8asite.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The example given was that a scientist at CERN  in Europe could publish a paper online and add a &#8220;live&#8221; link to a reference by a scientist across the world, as long as the other paper was also online.  Astounding.  I looked at the screen, slackjawed, tears in my eyes, and thought of having watched the Berlin Wall fall on TV.  The Wall fell in 1989.  </p>
<p>Sometimes, for a surprisingly long time, you can know things in your heart without knowing them in daily life, &amp; vice versa.  Maybe that&#8217;s where old media is with links.  I don&#8217;t see links in most newspaper &#8220;blog&#8221; articles.  </p>
<p>I wonder what percentage of high school kids can fix a broken link?  Or if the majority of journalists can make and fix links?  You know they have some Internet research techniques under their belts, but how close are they to linking to references?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
