Any search engine marketer who has attempted to register their client’s business web site with Google Local Business is met with some serious usability roadblocks. Google put into place several security and privacy steps, but they come at a price.
Before a listing is accepted, Google must call the business to verify they want their listing published. If you are the site owner and you’re entering your business information, you are likely also near a phone. When the automated phone call is placed, you’re there to answer it, retrieve the code it assigns you and finish your online application.
If you are a marketing company entering information for your clients, you can’t put in your phone number to get the code. There is no field for a third party to enter their number. One solution is to be on a conference call with your client while filling out the application and being present when they receive their Google phone call with their code. This is not a smooth or viable option.
If you have a client whose business is already in listed in Google Local and the information is in need of an update, the same annoying procedure applies. Google must call to assign a code before the changes are applied. They will only call the business owner.
Unless the code is immediately applied, the information on the screen is not accepted.
Cre8asiteforums members describe this, and other usability problems in a discussion called Completely And Utterly Farcical Google Local Verification Procedures.
A Google employee arrives to listen.





Thanks for outlining how the process works. I had often wondered how to get listed in the local search results, but the process remained largely a mystery until now.
Comment by Job Hunting Tips — August 5, 2009 @ 8:54 pm
I have had plenty of trouble with these local listings, but I do have to say that Google has improved things quite a bit. It used to be that you had to wait weeks for them to mail you a postcard with a code on it if it wasn’t convenient to do phone validation.
For businesses with an automatic phone answering system this was a nightmare, because it was impossible to get your phone number validated, because basically you have a robot calling a robot!
Pretty funny when you think about it…
Comment by steve blom — August 13, 2009 @ 7:23 pm
wow, when did this happen? I listed about 5 months ago with no problems.
Comment by Web Host Directory — August 29, 2009 @ 8:45 pm
Local search listing helps lot to increase the business. It is really useful for new emerging business who have to compete big fish in the market.
Comment by Ramon Simpson — September 9, 2009 @ 2:11 am
Thank you very much for sharing this interesting information. Knowing how the process works will help me improve my position in google listings. I’ll give it a try to add myself to the local directory.
Comment by Cecily — September 22, 2009 @ 2:33 pm
Wow that’s a really difficult process for something that seems so simple. Thanks so much for providing a how to for it. With as important as these local listings are for SEO and the user, it’s not something you want to have errors on.
Comment by Scott G. — September 24, 2009 @ 3:24 pm
Thank you for telling us how it works. What I do not understand is how this can provide security? As I know you also can give sip numbers and you or someone will be able to answer everywhere in the world.
Comment by Autos Versicherung — October 8, 2009 @ 3:08 pm
A somewhat daunting procedure, no doubt, but seeing how Google Local is getting massively spammed – particularly in the US – with repetitive listings, we should probably appreciate whatever anti-spam method Google comes up with.
Getting reviews isn’t all that easy either, seeing how clients of the client has to have a Google account. It would be much more effective, if we could just send out a newsletter/e-mail, ask for ‘our valued clients’ to click a link and fill out the form. No Google account needed. However, that would certainly lead to heaps of spam as well.
It can’t be easy to be Google.
Kind regards, Lasse
Comment by Webdesign priser — December 29, 2009 @ 6:54 am