http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2007/01/has-wikipedia-gone-no-follow/ Internet Marketing And SEO From A Different Point Of View Sun, 12 Oct 2008 10:02:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2007/01/has-wikipedia-gone-no-follow/#comment-60650 Removing Spam From the Net | Latent Semantic Indexing Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:58:12 +0000 http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2007/01/has-wikipedia-gone-no-follow/#comment-60650 [...] Now Matt Cutts, a Googler with some authority on this topic, has written a very clear explanation of what they’re doing about spam. This was triggered by a new service to create “Undetectable” spam. The follow-up to that is well described by Loren Baker in a post, Matt Cutts vs. V7N Links : Matt Wins. Another sign of the times is that Wikipedia seems to have gone the “No Follow” route in adding this tag to all its outlinks. So these will no longer count as inlinks conferring authority in the Google search process. [...] [...] Now Matt Cutts, a Googler with some authority on this topic, has written a very clear explanation of what they’re doing about spam. This was triggered by a new service to create “Undetectable” spam. The follow-up to that is well described by Loren Baker in a post, Matt Cutts vs. V7N Links : Matt Wins. Another sign of the times is that Wikipedia seems to have gone the “No Follow” route in adding this tag to all its outlinks. So these will no longer count as inlinks conferring authority in the Google search process. [...]

]]> http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2007/01/has-wikipedia-gone-no-follow/#comment-60359 Removing Spam From The Web | BPWrap Sun, 28 Jan 2007 00:57:41 +0000 http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2007/01/has-wikipedia-gone-no-follow/#comment-60359 [...] Now Matt Cutts, a Googler with some authority on this topic, has written a very clear explanation of what they’re doing about spam. This was triggered by a new service to create “Undetectable” spam. The follow-up to that is well described by Loren Baker in a post, Matt Cutts vs. V7N Links : Matt Wins. Another sign of the times is that Wikipedia seems to have gone the “No Follow” route in adding this tag to all its outlinks. So these will no longer count as inlinks conferring authority in the Google search process. [...] [...] Now Matt Cutts, a Googler with some authority on this topic, has written a very clear explanation of what they’re doing about spam. This was triggered by a new service to create “Undetectable” spam. The follow-up to that is well described by Loren Baker in a post, Matt Cutts vs. V7N Links : Matt Wins. Another sign of the times is that Wikipedia seems to have gone the “No Follow” route in adding this tag to all its outlinks. So these will no longer count as inlinks conferring authority in the Google search process. [...]

]]> http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2007/01/has-wikipedia-gone-no-follow/#comment-59817 Not BrinBoost - I Should Have Said BrainBoost | BPWrap Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:50:43 +0000 http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2007/01/has-wikipedia-gone-no-follow/#comment-59817 [...] Web Design   « Has Wikipedia gone “No Follow”? [...] [...] Web Design   « Has Wikipedia gone “No Follow”? [...]

]]>