<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ten Commandments For Google Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2008/04/google-links-ten-commandments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2008/04/google-links-ten-commandments/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing And SEO From A Different Point Of View</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Buchalka</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2008/04/google-links-ten-commandments/#comment-172072</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Buchalka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 09:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/?p=534#comment-172072</guid>
		<description>Some great information thank you.  I still find  it surprising that so many sites still  use poorly poorly written html and many sites don't seem to understand the significance of using keywords in link anchor text.

regards,

Anthony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some great information thank you.  I still find  it surprising that so many sites still  use poorly poorly written html and many sites don&#8217;t seem to understand the significance of using keywords in link anchor text.</p>
<p>regards,</p>
<p>Anthony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2008/04/google-links-ten-commandments/#comment-169530</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 11:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/?p=534#comment-169530</guid>
		<description>Linking strategy and SEO go hand in hand.  It seems to me that one of the more important (but completely unfair) rating methods is based on the age of the web site.  Unfair because it would indicate that new sites have little chance of good ratings.

The other issue is that you get rated on the quality of links to your site but surely this is susceptible to a newer, more refined version of 'Google Bombing' where you trash a serious competitiors site by creating one of those hated 10,000 page junk sites linking back to them.

Can you improve your rankings by getting a competitor delisted?  I believe so.  Would it be worth it?  I really can't answer that, I suspect not.  Regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linking strategy and SEO go hand in hand.  It seems to me that one of the more important (but completely unfair) rating methods is based on the age of the web site.  Unfair because it would indicate that new sites have little chance of good ratings.</p>
<p>The other issue is that you get rated on the quality of links to your site but surely this is susceptible to a newer, more refined version of &#8216;Google Bombing&#8217; where you trash a serious competitiors site by creating one of those hated 10,000 page junk sites linking back to them.</p>
<p>Can you improve your rankings by getting a competitor delisted?  I believe so.  Would it be worth it?  I really can&#8217;t answer that, I suspect not.  Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO, SEM and SMO Articles &#124; Business Internet Marketing &#124; SEO Aware</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2008/04/google-links-ten-commandments/#comment-163808</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO, SEM and SMO Articles &#124; Business Internet Marketing &#124; SEO Aware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/?p=534#comment-163808</guid>
		<description>[...] Ten Commandments For Google Links [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ten Commandments For Google Links [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Welford</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2008/04/google-links-ten-commandments/#comment-160581</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Welford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/?p=534#comment-160581</guid>
		<description>You're probably right, Malte. However the original Commandments were 'Thou Shalt Not's.  Verma was listing suggestions rather than prohibitions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re probably right, Malte. However the original Commandments were &#8216;Thou Shalt Not&#8217;s.  Verma was listing suggestions rather than prohibitions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malte Landwehr</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2008/04/google-links-ten-commandments/#comment-160186</link>
		<dc:creator>Malte Landwehr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 07:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/?p=534#comment-160186</guid>
		<description>I think most of Verma commandments go hand in hand.
Create Content (10) + Social Media (2) + Press Releases (6) = Link Baiting (3)
And this chain of action is probably the most successful. Even if it does not bring you the rankings you want, it lays a foundation of trust and natural backlinks upon which one can put a bunch of high PR links (via trading or buying).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most of Verma commandments go hand in hand.<br />
Create Content (10) + Social Media (2) + Press Releases (6) = Link Baiting (3)<br />
And this chain of action is probably the most successful. Even if it does not bring you the rankings you want, it lays a foundation of trust and natural backlinks upon which one can put a bunch of high PR links (via trading or buying).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reynder Bruyns</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2008/04/google-links-ten-commandments/#comment-160178</link>
		<dc:creator>Reynder Bruyns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 07:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/?p=534#comment-160178</guid>
		<description>Good solid post!! Almost everybody is focussing on 'how to'. This results in really idiotic linkbaiting articles from al sorts of seo 'experts' and no focus on content and best practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good solid post!! Almost everybody is focussing on &#8216;how to&#8217;. This results in really idiotic linkbaiting articles from al sorts of seo &#8216;experts&#8217; and no focus on content and best practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Welford</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2008/04/google-links-ten-commandments/#comment-159365</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Welford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 14:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/?p=534#comment-159365</guid>
		<description>I think you're right, Dave.  That's particularly why I added in Commandments #8 and #9, which are not part of the Google Quality Guidelines.  I'm absolutely sure, as are many others, that in addition to the poor PageRank for such links, the Google algorithms will apply a very low weighting to such links.  It's a double whammy on them.  I only wish some of the Link gurus would point this out more forcefully.

If you have automated systems that produce tens of thousands of such links, then perhaps you can win.  Anything that involves human effort to get mere hundreds is a complete waste of resources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right, Dave.  That&#8217;s particularly why I added in Commandments #8 and #9, which are not part of the Google Quality Guidelines.  I&#8217;m absolutely sure, as are many others, that in addition to the poor PageRank for such links, the Google algorithms will apply a very low weighting to such links.  It&#8217;s a double whammy on them.  I only wish some of the Link gurus would point this out more forcefully.</p>
<p>If you have automated systems that produce tens of thousands of such links, then perhaps you can win.  Anything that involves human effort to get mere hundreds is a complete waste of resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Robinson</title>
		<link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2008/04/google-links-ten-commandments/#comment-159363</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 14:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/?p=534#comment-159363</guid>
		<description>Nice post, thanks. It's obvious if you frequent business forums with SEO sections that website owners are getting horribly bewitched bothered bewildered by the subject of link building.

It's also obvious, to me anyway, that Google is going to have to work very very hard on their algo if it's going to remain useful. Link spamming is reaching epidemic proportions with thousands of companies offering rubbish links that seem to impact the SERPs. We live in interesting times.

d</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, thanks. It&#8217;s obvious if you frequent business forums with SEO sections that website owners are getting horribly bewitched bothered bewildered by the subject of link building.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also obvious, to me anyway, that Google is going to have to work very very hard on their algo if it&#8217;s going to remain useful. Link spamming is reaching epidemic proportions with thousands of companies offering rubbish links that seem to impact the SERPs. We live in interesting times.</p>
<p>d</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
